Back in June, there was a follow up on if we should allow 3D questions to which no one seemed to disagree (but I don't think it's too late if you want to chime in and disagree or nuance some things).
I think there was an interesting case yesterday in this question which asks which of the two designs for a device better convey a specific feeling.
Would the question have been accepted if it had presented the object in 2D form instead of 3D (sketch, illustration of some other flatter style...)?
If we allow 2D critiques so long as they follow more objective guidelines, should we allow 3D critiques if they follow the same guidelines?
And if we do, does it matter what type of 3D object it is so long as the focus is on what is conveyed visually and not focused on usability/manufacturing? Closer to what seems more typical in the field, should we allow critiques on packaging designs?