I just saw we still have a "graphics" tag.

Seems untidy since it could be applied to literally every question we have. Whether or not a question is tagged with it appears to be completely random.

Can we - I believe the technical term is - "burninate" it?

bump It looks like we're agreed that a graphics Q&A is no place for graphics questions, how do we begin stamping them out?

I saw a mention of an obstacle being questions only tagged "graphics", which may need to be manually re-tagged. If this is the case, can someone post some magic search link that lists such questions? https://graphicdesign.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graphics lists all graphics questions, but I can't see a way to see questions only tagged with "graphics".

| |
  • 4
    +1 for the Q title alone :) But yes, I agree. – Vincent Jun 3 '15 at 14:47
  • I am for this as well but if we are going to do it we need to make an to the 20 questions that have this tag. – DᴀʀᴛʜVᴀᴅᴇʀ Jun 3 '15 at 14:56
  • Oh sure, kill it when I'm 1 tick away from getting a badge for it :) Actually agree.. it's kind of a stupid tag. – Scott Jun 3 '15 at 16:47
  • Looks like someone's already made a magic search: data.stackexchange.com/graphicdesign/query/232959/… :) Not too many according to that query. – Dom Jun 9 '15 at 19:36

Can we kill too, while we are at it (for the same reasons)?

| |
  • 6
    I'd disagree, 90%+ of our questions are about design not art, but we do welcome visual arts questions, so I think it has a purpose. Looking at the tagged questions, some are mistagged but most are actually questions about art and not design. – user56reinstatemonica8 Jun 4 '15 at 15:54
  • 1
    what if we refined this one to 'fine-art'? That might give it a bit more clarity. – DA01 Jun 14 '15 at 21:02

Does it fit as a synonym of ?

On first thought that seems like the best thing to do with it to me.

| |

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .