Timeline for UPDATED (March 14): Design for graphicdesign.se
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
41 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2020 at 10:44 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Apr 5, 2014 at 0:04 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
|
|
| Apr 1, 2014 at 23:50 | comment | added | Pdxd | Not to burst your bubble because I do think it looks awesome but it looks a lot like the favicon for the RPG SE (rpg.stackexchange.com) | |
| Mar 17, 2014 at 15:13 | comment | added | Jaydles StaffMod | +1 - this is great. I wasn't sure how to use the feedback on the logo to improve it, but I think this nails it. | |
| Mar 17, 2014 at 11:15 | comment | added | user56reinstatemonica8 | Nice. Couple of small comments: 1) the numbers in circles on 'related questions' etc look a bit disconnected from the other more angular elements, and look a bit like ordered list numbers rather than scores (also not sure how they'd scale to two-digit numbers) - maybe an outlined diamond or similar geometric shape like 'ask a question' shape would be more consistent, more like a points score and more scalable? 2) the splashes of green are great but the red at the top maybe looks a bit lost - I wonder how it'd look without the turquoise, with currently turquoise elements either red or green? | |
| Mar 16, 2014 at 19:37 | comment | added | Yisela Mod | Looks amazing! Nice work, I can't wait to see it live :) | |
| Mar 16, 2014 at 1:46 | comment | added | Lauren-Clear-Monica-Ipsum | Tons and tons better. The teal is not my style, but it's not offensive. Thank you for taking our comments into consideration. :) | |
| Mar 16, 2014 at 1:07 | comment | added | Adam Schuld | Harsh crowd to design for, but I think the edit looks clean and amazing. Great job. | |
| Mar 14, 2014 at 21:34 | answer | added | DA01 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 14, 2014 at 21:30 | comment | added | DA01 | I think the revision is a good one. Nice work! | |
| Mar 14, 2014 at 20:32 | comment | added | benteh | A gigantic pile of kudos to you Stéphane, for bothering to listen to us! :D And hurrah for new logo :D | |
| Mar 14, 2014 at 20:09 | history | edited | JohnBMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
changed title to attract attention from the community bulletin
|
| Mar 14, 2014 at 18:47 | comment | added | Ryan | Hmm now instead of the GR being weird the RA is all pushed together. Definitely like this a whole lot better though! Thanks! | |
| Mar 14, 2014 at 18:29 | answer | added | JohnBMod | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 14, 2014 at 16:51 | comment | added | Jin Mod | I liked the design before, but I think the updated version is even better. Thanks to community for the feedback. | |
| Mar 14, 2014 at 14:56 | comment | added | user9447 | @StéphaneMartin we can expect roll out tomorrow right?? ;) | |
| Mar 14, 2014 at 11:15 | comment | added | Vincent | re:EDIT: that looks great! | |
| Mar 14, 2014 at 8:48 | history | edited | StéphaneStaff | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Some changes to the initial design based on your answers and comments
|
| Mar 13, 2014 at 20:34 | comment | added | DA01 | A heads up: Not sure if it's a huge deal, but FYI I noticed the icon for RollPlaying.se is using a red wireframe of a multi-sided die that looks a lot like this. | |
| Mar 11, 2014 at 1:28 | answer | added | Alan GilbertsonMod | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 10, 2014 at 13:13 | comment | added | user56reinstatemonica8 | A thought - the palette is rather close to that of Adobe's forums (both are based on a red logo, a mostly pale grey design, cyan links, and a prominent near-black bar). This is much nicer than Adobe's, but should we differentiate ourselves more? | |
| Mar 9, 2014 at 5:58 | answer | added | DA01 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 9, 2014 at 5:52 | comment | added | DA01 | Also: Would you be able/willing to show us more of your sketch work that predates the final here? Sometimes that is where the critique can reveal a much broader range of solutions. | |
| Mar 9, 2014 at 5:48 | comment | added | DA01 | It should also be noted that a logo for 'graphic design' is a rather daunting task, so kudos for trying to tackling it. It's not an easy gig. | |
| Mar 9, 2014 at 5:47 | comment | added | DA01 | First, yes, it's impossible to please a room full of graphic designers. So, don't sweat anything we say too much. :) That said, I have to agree that while the logomark is nice, I don't know that it's the best fit for graphic design. I actually like the line-drawing version you use in the background better. I'm also not thrilled with the 'G' but that's just a personal opinion so that that for what it is. (All that said: great work!) | |
| Mar 8, 2014 at 5:58 | comment | added | Bala | I like the font very much!! I would like to know the font name in the menu. | |
| Mar 7, 2014 at 15:33 | comment | added | Saaru Lindestøkke | In support of boblets point that it's too 3D-forumy: the proposed logo reminded me of this site which has a slightly similar logo. The site is all about community 3D printing. I do like the colour choice though. | |
| Mar 7, 2014 at 11:50 | answer | added | user56reinstatemonica8 | timeline score: 13 | |
| Mar 5, 2014 at 12:46 | answer | added | Brendan | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 5, 2014 at 10:52 | answer | added | Vincent | timeline score: 5 | |
| Mar 4, 2014 at 20:19 | comment | added | user9447 | It's not very constructive if people just come here to downvote other's opinion without some explanation why. | |
| Mar 4, 2014 at 19:45 | answer | added | YiselaMod | timeline score: 6 | |
| Mar 4, 2014 at 16:30 | answer | added | user9447 | timeline score: 4 | |
| Mar 4, 2014 at 13:46 | answer | added | benteh | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 4, 2014 at 13:37 | history | edited | StéphaneStaff | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 15 characters in body
|
| Mar 4, 2014 at 10:55 | answer | added | Lauren-Clear-Monica-Ipsum | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 4, 2014 at 10:31 | comment | added | benteh | Greetings, this is exciting news - yes you have an uphill struggle there, designing for designers :) I would just like to point out one thing; the logo seems a little too mathematical to me. I promptly get the impression of 3D-forum for 3D s/w. It would work well for Blender, Maya etc. I will come back to you with a proper answer, just thought I should mention this. | |
| Mar 4, 2014 at 9:21 | answer | added | Dom | timeline score: 4 | |
| Mar 4, 2014 at 7:46 | answer | added | Scott | timeline score: 17 | |
| Mar 4, 2014 at 7:42 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackDesign/status/440754021180387328 | ||
| Mar 4, 2014 at 5:05 | history | asked | StéphaneStaff | CC BY-SA 3.0 |