Skip to main content
Graphic Design

Return to Answer

replaced http://meta.graphicdesign.stackexchange.com/ with https://graphicdesign.meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link
Community Bot
Community Bot
  • 1

I think your answer is appropriate for this case, because it is a user that has repeatedly asked similar questions with general poor samples. So as you mention, for exceptional cases, yes. Something I don't like, though, is the idea of having this answer practically copy-pasted over different questions. I would however use a different tone for new users.

Font-identification questions are probably something we'll always have around unless our scope changes. Some of them add no content and are generally un-traceable, other can be challenging and even enjoyable. I think we should definitely always point to a font-recognition service first (at least to the tag description), and using comments.

There has been some discussion on the subject, although these threads might be a bit old. Maybe we need to re-ask the quesiton of font-id: on or off-topic?

I think your answer is appropriate for this case, because it is a user that has repeatedly asked similar questions with general poor samples. So as you mention, for exceptional cases, yes. Something I don't like, though, is the idea of having this answer practically copy-pasted over different questions. I would however use a different tone for new users.

Font-identification questions are probably something we'll always have around unless our scope changes. Some of them add no content and are generally un-traceable, other can be challenging and even enjoyable. I think we should definitely always point to a font-recognition service first (at least to the tag description), and using comments.

There has been some discussion on the subject, although these threads might be a bit old. Maybe we need to re-ask the quesiton of font-id: on or off-topic?

I think your answer is appropriate for this case, because it is a user that has repeatedly asked similar questions with general poor samples. So as you mention, for exceptional cases, yes. Something I don't like, though, is the idea of having this answer practically copy-pasted over different questions. I would however use a different tone for new users.

Font-identification questions are probably something we'll always have around unless our scope changes. Some of them add no content and are generally un-traceable, other can be challenging and even enjoyable. I think we should definitely always point to a font-recognition service first (at least to the tag description), and using comments.

There has been some discussion on the subject, although these threads might be a bit old. Maybe we need to re-ask the quesiton of font-id: on or off-topic?

added 121 characters in body
Source Link
Yisela Mod
Yisela Mod
  • 26.5k
  • 15
  • 26

I think your answer is appropriate for this case, because it is a user that has repeatedly asked similar questions with general poor samples. So as you mention, for exceptional cases, yes. Something I don't like, though, is the idea of having this answer practically copy-pasted over different questions. I would however use a different tone for new users.

Font-identification questions are probably something we'll always have around unless our scope changes. Some of them add no content and are generally un-trackabletraceable, other can be challenging and even enjoyable. I think we should definitely always point to a font-recognition service first, but your answer here would almost deem all font-identification questions off-topic(at least to the tag description), and using comments.

There has been some discussion on the subject, although these threads might be a bit old. We probablyMaybe we need to agree on onre-topicask the quesiton of font-id: on or off-topic first.?

I think your answer is appropriate for this case, because it is a user that has repeatedly asked similar questions with general poor samples.

Font-identification questions are probably something we'll always have around unless our scope changes. Some of them add no content and are generally un-trackable, other can be challenging and even enjoyable. I think we should definitely always point to a font-recognition service first, but your answer here would almost deem all font-identification questions off-topic.

There has been some discussion on the subject, although these threads might be a bit old. We probably need to agree on on-topic or off-topic first.

I think your answer is appropriate for this case, because it is a user that has repeatedly asked similar questions with general poor samples. So as you mention, for exceptional cases, yes. Something I don't like, though, is the idea of having this answer practically copy-pasted over different questions. I would however use a different tone for new users.

Font-identification questions are probably something we'll always have around unless our scope changes. Some of them add no content and are generally un-traceable, other can be challenging and even enjoyable. I think we should definitely always point to a font-recognition service first (at least to the tag description), and using comments.

There has been some discussion on the subject, although these threads might be a bit old. Maybe we need to re-ask the quesiton of font-id: on or off-topic?

added 45 characters in body
Source Link
Yisela Mod
Yisela Mod
  • 26.5k
  • 15
  • 26

This is my personal opinion: I think your answer is appropriate for this case, because it is a user that has repeatedly asked similar questions with general poor samples.

I think fontFont-identification questions are probably something we'll always have around unless our scope changes. Some of them add no content and are generally un-trackable, other can be challenging and even enjoyable. I think we should definitely always point to a font-recognition service first, but your answer here would almost deem all font-identification questions off-topic.

There has been some discussion on the subject, although these threads might be a bit old:. We probably need to agree on on-topic or off-topic first.

This is my personal opinion: I think your answer is appropriate for this case, because it is a user that has repeatedly asked similar questions with general poor samples.

I think font-identification questions are probably something we'll always have around. Some of them add no content and are generally un-trackable, other can be challenging and even enjoyable. I think we should definitely always point to a font-recognition service first, but your answer here would almost deem all font-identification questions off-topic.

There has been some discussion on the subject, although these threads might be a bit old:

I think your answer is appropriate for this case, because it is a user that has repeatedly asked similar questions with general poor samples.

Font-identification questions are probably something we'll always have around unless our scope changes. Some of them add no content and are generally un-trackable, other can be challenging and even enjoyable. I think we should definitely always point to a font-recognition service first, but your answer here would almost deem all font-identification questions off-topic.

There has been some discussion on the subject, although these threads might be a bit old. We probably need to agree on on-topic or off-topic first.

Source Link
Yisela Mod
Yisela Mod
  • 26.5k
  • 15
  • 26